In 1960 Frank Sinatra's Danny Ocean grouped together his
old muckers from the army, 82nd airborne I believe, back
in a day when oaps were trendy and movies starred old men
with wisp-brushed-over bald spots and slightly younger fellas
in cardigans. T'wouldn't be hard to make a more trendy version
of this selfsatisfied smug-fest. would it?
The problem with the original, viewed from the 21st century
is who are all those guys? Why so many?Add that to knocking
over six casinos, and each guy has so little screen time
you don’t know who it is.
Technology.
Oh george and the boys have a lot.Winches and computer
experts and finger print overwrites and this and that.What
do Frankie and his posse have?
Infra red paint. A large part of the movie is watching
whilst six guys manouvere near to six doors and give them
a touch of infra red paint.So that, when the lights go,
they know that the door they’re standing next to is
the one. Inane.Usually these sixties films, let down by
their technology are still the winners in down right cool
and style. Think Jamie Bond, think Mastroianni.But these
inept caperers are the worst dressed, badest haircuted mob
ever to think they were the cat's pyjamas.
Ofcourse the 2002 is over run with clichés.The girlfriend
who runs an art gallery, why is that particularly so popular?
OK, Frank has the better ending, watch it on DVD so you
don’t have to sit through the rest of it
Hmm.
So which is best? let's just say that Miss Anonymous, my
co-reviewee who was rivetted through out george and brad's
version - come on, the guy can even make eating a hamburger
and getting the mayo all over his face look sexy, she managed
twenty minutes of the cardy boys tough guys before deciding
to go and watch blind date on the portable.
Sharp suits vs Cardigans
Sleazy misfits vs Army buddies
Julia Roberts vs Angie Dickinson |
|